The mountain lion attacked so fast, it barely made a noise.
In the middle of the night earlier this week, a lion snuck into an Idledale, Colorado resident’s bedroom, and in an instant, snatched a 12-year-old yellow Labrador retriever named Scout while his owners slept just a few feet away, the
Denver Post reported.
The lion, a 130-pound male, bolted through the window with the dog in its jaws, cleared a six-foot fence, and was gone. The next day, personnel from Colorado Division of Wildlife set a trap for the lion where he stashed the dog’s carcass. When the lion returned to feed, it was killed.
Events like this recharge debate about the sometimes bloody clashes between people and wild animals that occur at the intersection of development and wilderness.
The exurbanization of undesignated wilderness areas is an extremely complicated issue—people gotta live somewhere, but so do mountain lions. It’s well justified to destroy an apex predator that sneaks into homes to hunt, which is a sure deviation from natural behavior. Not to mention that Scout’s fate could have easily befallen a child. Yet it’s still hard to fault the mountain lion completely.
Nature is lazy; opportunistic predators are always going to pounce on the easy meal. Humans and some wide-ranging migratory birds are among the few species that will do things just because they’re hard, and carving a home out of the Colorado wilderness is a convenient example of this.
The lion’s behavior was unnatural, no doubt, but it’s hard to imagine the beast would have gotten a taste for pets, if homes weren’t encroaching on its habitat in the first place.
So, I ask you: Are humans justified in wielding the fiery sword of natural selection by killing non-people-fearing animals, or are hunted and snatched pets an inevitable form of collateral damage?
--Casey Lyons
Mountain lion snatches down from owners' bedroom (Denver Post)
Officials kill mountain lion that snatched dog (Denver Post)
Mountain lion that seized dog is caught, killed (Denver Post)
READERS COMMENTS
I WONDERER WOULD PEOPLE SAY THAT ITS JUSTIFIED THAT A LARGE PREDATOR SNATCHES A PET FROM A HOME WHAT IF ITS THE OTHER WAY AROUND IT TAKES A CHILD INSTEAD THEN WE GET THAT WORD AGAIN JUSTIFIED IM HERE TO SAY OUR PETS ALTHOUGH NOT HUMAN ARE AS MUCH AT RISK .YOU RAISE THEM FROM A BABY TO ADULT THAT IS LIKE RAISING A CHILD SO YES WE DO TAKE A CHANCE WHEN WE CAMP OUT IN THE WILD,THEN YES WE BROUGHT IT ON OURSELVES BUT WHEN THEY COME IN A HOME THEN IT SHOULD BE HUNT DOWN AND DESTROYED.MAYBE OTHER SIMULAR ATTACKS HAPPEN AND ARE NOT REPORTED BECAUSE PEOPLE THINK THEY MUST OF RAN OFF JUST THINK ABOUT IT.
Posted: Sep 09, 2008 ELLA
ADD A COMMENT